TEST: fanxiang FF952 512GB USB flash drive
Here you can find a detailed performance and benchmark test of the USB flash drive FF952 with 512GB (FF952-512GB) from fanxiang.890
0,18 $
| Technical data | |
| Image | 
|
| Manufacturer | fanxiang |
| Model number | FF952-512GB |
| Storage capacity | 512 GB (477 GiB) |
| pSLC-Cache | >400 GB approx. |
| Read speed | 1050 MB/s |
| Write speed | 950 MB/s |
| Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 2x1 (10 Gbit/s) |
| Connection | USB Typ A+C |
| Price | ca. 90 AUD (= 0,18 $ / GB) |
| Paid link | Buy on Amazon |
Compared to the top performer*
*) Test result evaluated according to AS SSD Score within the same size.
AS SSD Benchmark
Standard performance test
The standard test was performed with a 1 GB file. A total score of 890 points was achieved.
| AS SSD | Read: | Write: |
|---|---|---|
| Seq in megabytes per second |
1014,46 MB/s |
964,02 MB/s |
| 4K in megabytes per second |
24,77 MB/s |
76,63 MB/s |
| 4K-64Thrd in megabytes per second |
163,15 MB/s |
272,81 MB/s |
| Access time in milliseconds |
0,049 ms |
0,120 ms |
| Score | 289 |
446 |
| Total score | 890 |
|
Copy Performance Test
A common everyday situation is simulated here. Three test folders are created:
- ISO (folder with two large files)
- Program (folder with many small files)
- Game (folder with small and large files)
The three folders are copied using the Windows Copy command (the cache remains enabled). The practical test of September 08, 2025 shows the performance for simultaneous write and read operations. The lower the duration, the better the performance.
| AS SSD Copy-Benchmark | Transfer rate: | Duration: |
|---|---|---|
| ISO two large files |
640,82 MB/s |
1,68 s |
| Program many small files |
192,99 MB/s |
7,29 s |
| Game small and large files |
432,14 MB/s |
3,20 s |
Compression Performance Test
Here, the writing and reading speed of the the fanxiang USB flash driveSSD is measured depending on the compressibility of the data (according to the manufacturer, these should be 1050MB/s and 950MB/s respectively).
CrystalDiskMark Benchmark
Here, two sequential and two random performance tests are performed, similar to the ones performed on the AS SSD.
| CDM | Read [MB/s] | Write [MB/s] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
1088,74 |
1030,04 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
1028,87 |
979,28 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
154,94 |
315,97 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
28,33 |
84,50 |
Input/Output operations per second
| CDM | Read [IOPS] | Write [IOPS] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
1.038,30 |
982,30 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
981,20 |
933,90 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
37.825,90 |
77.141,40 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
6.917,50 |
20.630,10 |
Average latency
| CDM | Read [µs] | Write [µs] |
|---|---|---|
| SEQ1M Q8T1 |
7.695,04 |
8.124,81 |
| SEQ1M Q1T1 |
1.018,66 |
1.070,21 |
| RND4K Q32T16 |
13.508,10 |
6.629,57 |
| RND4K Q1T1 |
144,42 |
48,35 |
HD Tune Pro Endurance test
A long-term test was performed here to make full use of the memory capacity. You can see when a cache is full and the writing performance decreases. A test file of 400 GB was written to the medium. The exact cache size could not be determined, because the test file did not exhaust the cache (brought it to the limit).At least the test file could be read with an average write speed of 1044 MB/s and written with 980 MB/s.
ATTO Disk Benchmark
Here, a 256 MB file is written several times to the 512 GB fanxiang USB flash drive . The I/O block size varies (from 512 bytes to 64 megabytes). The larger the blocks, the faster they can be written and read.
SSD-Z Benchmark
Similar to HD Tune, a 500 MB file is written to the 512 GB fanxiang USB flash drive here. is written. The transfer data is displayed. The more constant the line, the better.
Information about the test system can be found at the bottom of the home page.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.